Hey Surfaces!
It looks like you've got experience working in QNX. I know from a *nix point of view, the partitions are t4d, t4e, t4f, and t50 for that last one. However, from within QNX, the partition ID's read differently - t77, t78, t79, and t80 (for the original drive). Any idea why that is?
With smaller drives the conversion seems to work just fine when I initialize that last partition as t80 from within QNX, so I didn't suspect that would be an issue. I'll go back and try reinitializing the partition of the 120 GB drive as type 50. As an aside, how big were you able to upgrade the drive? Is there a limit?
- Aaron
EDIT (for anyone who may actually follow the thread): After I got back from the office today, I gave Surface's recommendation a shot on the 20 GB laptop drive I know to work within the MyGig unit. I hooked it up to the laptop with QNX running and reformatted using his steps with the partition ID of t50. Unfortunately, the MyGig did not read the last partition, indicating that I have a 0.0 GB drive installed. The good news is that even with the fourth partition unreadable, you can verify the fact that the hard drive is functioning properly by confirming that the navigation maps load up, or by going into system information and confirming that there is a database version displayed (on a side note, the Gracenotes database is stored on that fourth partition, so that may not show up). I plugged the drive back into the laptop, reinitialized the fourth partition as type t80, and checked out how a completely empty fourth partition would be handled in the MyGig. Even without any system files on that fourth partition, the size and free space of the drive was picked up and displayed.
How does this translate to my 120 GB EIDE swap project? Poorly. More and more evidence is pointing to some fundamental compatibility issue. There's still a long shot that the 9.799 patch may have a positive effect, since the symptoms match, but I'm doubtful.